Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Adding terraform to create resources for csi driver secrets #7047

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Adding terraform to create resources for csi driver secrets #7047

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ritikaguptams
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Jul 22, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @ritikaguptams. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ritikaguptams
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign dims for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/infra Infrastructure management, infrastructure design, code in infra/ area/infra/azure Issues or PRs related to Kubernetes Azure infrastructure size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. sig/k8s-infra Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG K8s Infra. labels Jul 22, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from dims and upodroid July 22, 2024 21:42
@ritikaguptams ritikaguptams mentioned this pull request Jul 22, 2024
Closed
11 tasks
@aramase
Copy link
Member

aramase commented Jul 23, 2024

/cc

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from aramase July 23, 2024 05:20
@ritikaguptams ritikaguptams marked this pull request as ready for review July 23, 2024 06:01
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 23, 2024
@ritikaguptams ritikaguptams marked this pull request as draft July 23, 2024 06:01
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 23, 2024
@ritikaguptams ritikaguptams force-pushed the terraform-csi-driver-secret branch from 7513596 to 7c845b3 Compare July 24, 2024 00:33
@ritikaguptams ritikaguptams marked this pull request as ready for review July 24, 2024 00:34
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 24, 2024
@aramase
Copy link
Member

aramase commented Jul 24, 2024

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Jul 24, 2024
aramase
aramase reviewed Jul 24, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@aramase aramase left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just one small nit!

I'll open a follow-up PR to update the docs.

infra/azure/terraform/csi-driver-secret/README.md Outdated
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: let's just call the directory secrets-store-csi-driver instead of csi-driver-secret

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

@ritikaguptams ritikaguptams force-pushed the terraform-csi-driver-secret branch 2 times, most recently from 4239a7e to 2b22e2c Compare July 24, 2024 23:14
aramase
aramase reviewed Jul 25, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@aramase aramase left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 25, 2024
jsturtevant
jsturtevant reviewed Jul 25, 2024
View reviewed changes
infra/azure/terraform/secrets-store-csi-driver/main.tf
# Create a secret in the Key Vault
resource "azurerm_key_vault_secret" "kv_secret" {
name = "secret1"
value = "test"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe a note here that this is for testing purposes only?

infra/azure/terraform/secrets-store-csi-driver/main.tf Outdated
# Data source to get the current client configuration
data "azurerm_client_config" "current" {}

# TODO: add state maintainence in Azure
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is this a note for the Azure remote backend?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yep

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Nov 4, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Close this PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Dec 4, 2024
@jsturtevant
Copy link
Contributor

/remove-lifecycle rotten

@ritikaguptams I believe this is already applied in the sub. Can we make this ready to merge?

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. label Dec 4, 2024
@ritikaguptams ritikaguptams force-pushed the terraform-csi-driver-secret branch from 2b22e2c to a11deab Compare December 5, 2024 20:44
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 5, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@ritikaguptams ritikaguptams force-pushed the terraform-csi-driver-secret branch from a11deab to 110bff8 Compare December 5, 2024 20:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@sftim sftim sftim left review comments

@aramase aramase aramase left review comments

@jsturtevant jsturtevant jsturtevant left review comments

@dims dims Awaiting requested review from dims

@upodroid upodroid Awaiting requested review from upodroid

Assignees

@aramase aramase

Labels
area/infra/azure Issues or PRs related to Kubernetes Azure infrastructure area/infra Infrastructure management, infrastructure design, code in infra/ cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. sig/k8s-infra Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG K8s Infra. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
6 participants
@ritikaguptams @k8s-ci-robot @aramase @k8s-triage-robot @jsturtevant @sftim